User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows Phone OS 7.5; Trident/3.1; IEMobile/7.0; HTC; PC40100)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCPC40100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 7.0Trident 3.1WinPhone Mobile Phoneyesyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows 7.5HTCSparkmobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.0Trident Windows Phone 7.5HTCPC40100smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.5HTCPC40100closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.085 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone 7.5HTC7 Trophymobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 7.5HTCSparkSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:28 | by ThaDafinser