User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) Runet-Research-Crawler (itrack.ru/research/cmsrate; rating@itrack.ru)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Runet-Research-Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneric Research CrawlerBot/Crawler0.15802 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesRunet-Research-Crawlerclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:28 | by ThaDafinser