User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; Sony; KDL22EX320; PKG4.017EUA; 2011;);; en) Presto/2.7.61 Version/11.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyKDL22EX320 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.00Presto 2.7Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.00Presto GNU/Linux SonyKDL22EX320tv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeSony 2011SonyKDL22EX320closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.0Presto 2.7.61Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.416 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 2.9Presto 2.7.61 SonyBravia EX320 Smart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:28 | by ThaDafinser