User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100317 Postbox/1.1.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Postbox 1.1.3Mac 10.6 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Postbox 1.1.3closeOS X 10.6email-clientcloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Postbox 1.1 Mac 10.6desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeMac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.9.1.8closeOS X 10.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.105 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.1.8Gecko 20100317Mac OS X 10.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Postbox 1.1Gecko 1.9.1Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:27 | by ThaDafinser