User agent detail

WebVulnCrawl.blogspot.com/1.0 libwww-perl/5.803
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
WebVulnCrawl Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yeslibwwwBot/Crawler0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
WebVulnCrawl closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
libwww-perl 5.803close software-librarycloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Perl 5.803 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesWebVulnCrawlclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
libwww-perl 5.803close closecloseclosecloseclose0.054 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Library for WWW in Perl 5.803 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesPerlclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:27 | by ThaDafinser