User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; HUAWEI C8950D Build/HuaweiC8950D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.64 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiC8950D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.0.4HuaweiC8950Dmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 28.0Blink Android 4.0HuaweiC8950Dsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.0.4HuaweiC8950Dcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.64WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.64Blink Android 4.0.4HuaweiHonor+mobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 28closeAndroid 4.0HuaweiC8950DSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.053 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:26 | by ThaDafinser