User agent detail

Lenovo_A588t_TD/V1 Linux/3.4.67 Android/4.4.2 Release/08.13.2014 Browser/AppleWebKit537.36 Chrome/30.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36 System/Android 4.4.2;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-chrome.yaml
Chromium WebView 30Android 4.4.2Webkit 537.36LenovoA588mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA588mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 30.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA588tsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 30.0.0closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA588t_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.10501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.0.0WebKit Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47105 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium WebView 30Webkit 537.36Android 4.4.2LenovoA588mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.0.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:26 | by ThaDafinser