User agent detail

de.drivelog.mobile 3.2 phone HTCOne android 18 de DE normal long high 1080 1920
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCOne android 18 de DE normal long high 1080 1920 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
de closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCOne android 18 de DE normal long high 1080 1920mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 18HTCOnesmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 18closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCOne android 18 de DE normal long high 1080 1920closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android 18HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCOne android 18 de DE normal long high 1080 1920mobile:featureyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:26 | by ThaDafinser