User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; GTB7.4; InfoPath.3; SV1; .NET CLR 3.1.76908; WOW64; en-US)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
yesFake IEBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake IEBot/Crawler0.17002 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 9.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.20302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows Vistadesktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 9.0closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 9.0Trident 4.0Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:25 | by ThaDafinser