User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; XBLWP7; ZuneWP7)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsphone.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0Windows Phone 7 mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 7.0Trident 3.1WinPhone7.5 7.5Mobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows 6.1GenericWindows Phone 7mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.0Trident Windows Phone yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Large Screen 7.0closeWindows Phone closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.09801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile 7.0 Windows Phone 7closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0 Windows Phone 7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows 8Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:25 | by ThaDafinser