User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.127 Large Screen Safari/533.4 GoogleTV/162853
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
GoogleTV Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 5.0WebKit Linux GoogleGoogleTVTV Device0.10701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 5.0WebKit Google TV 162853GoogleGoogleTVtvyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 5.0.375closeGoogleTV GoogleTVcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.10401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 5.0.375.127WebKit 533.4Google TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 5Webkit 533.4Google TV televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 5.0.375.127closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 11.0.696.77closeLinux i686 GoogleTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:23 | by ThaDafinser