User agent detail

[FBAN/FB4A;FBAV/2.3;FBBV/149649;FBDM/{density=1.5,width=480,height=800};FBLC/es_ES;FBCR/;FBPN/com.facebook.katana;FBDV/LG-P920;FBSV/2.2.2;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-767.php
Facebook App 0.0unknown unknownunknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Facebook close LGP920;FBSVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 2.3 LGP920smartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 2.3close LGP920closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LGLGP920closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook LGP920;FBSVmobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:23 | by ThaDafinser