User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; TM-9751HD Build/MASTER) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 YaBrowser/1.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
TexetTM-9751HD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 1.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.172closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 1.0.1364.172closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.29003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 1.0Blink Android 4.1yes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 1.0.1364.172closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 1.0.1364closeAndroid 4.1.1TexetTM-9751HDcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 1.0.1364.172WebKit 537.22Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 1.0Webkit 537.22Android 4.1.1teXetTM-9751HDtabletyescloseclose0.06201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.172closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.057 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:22 | by ThaDafinser