User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_0) AppleWebKit/601.2.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/9.0.1 Safari/601.2.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 9.0.1OS X El Capitan 10.11Webkit 601.2.7desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 9.0WebKit MacOSX 10.11AppleMacintoshDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 9.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 9.0.1closeOS X 10.11.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.39504 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 9.0WebKit Mac 10.11desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 9.0.1closeOS X 10.11.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 9.0.1closeMac OS X 10.11.0closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 9.0.1closeOS X 10.11.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 9.0.1WebKit 601.2.7Mac OS X 10.11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.66207 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 9.0.1Webkit 601.2.7OS X El Capitan 10.11desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 9.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 9.0.1closeMac OS X 10.10.5Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:22 | by ThaDafinser