User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; LG-D300; rv:18.1) Gecko/18.1 Firefox/18.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Firefox 18.1FirefoxOS 1.118.1 18.1LGFireWebMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 18.1Gecko 18.1FirefoxOS 1.1LGFireWebMobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 18.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Firefox 18.1close LGD300mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 18.1Gecko Firefox OS LGD300smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 18.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 18.1closeFirefox OS 1.1LGD300closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 18.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 18.1Gecko 18.1 LGLGD300closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile 18.1Gecko 18.1Firefox OS 1.1LGFirewebmobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 18.1closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGD300Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:22 | by ThaDafinser