User agent detail

MQQBrowser/40 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 4S; CPU iPhone OS 6_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/10B142 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-ios.yaml
QQ Browser 4.0iOS 6.1Webkit 536.26AppleiPhone 4Smobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 40closeiOS 6.1SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 40WebKit iOS 6.1AppleiPhone 4Ssmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 6.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 40closeiOS 6.1closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 6.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 40WebKit 536.26iOS 6.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 4.0Webkit 536.26iOS 6.1AppleiPhone 4Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:21 | by ThaDafinser