User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-US; TAB-97E-01 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.4.1.565 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.4Android 4.2unknown ReellexTAB-97E-01Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.4U3 Android 4.2ReellexTAB-97E-01Tabletyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.4WebKit Android 4.2yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.4.1closeAndroid 4.2.2TAB-97E-01closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.4.1.565WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.4Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2TAB-97E-01mobile:smartyescloseclose0.09301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:21 | by ThaDafinser