User agent detail

Nokia6700s/062.001 (SymbianOS/9.3; U; Series60/3.2; Mozilla/5.0; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML,like Gecko) Safari/525
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series60.yaml
Series60 3.2Webkit 525Nokia6700 slidemobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 525closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.3Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.17602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.2Nokia6700ssmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 062.001closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser closeSymbian OS 9.3Nokia6700scloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia BrowsercloseSymbianOS 9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.20702 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 525NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6700scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 525Series60 3.2Nokia6700 slidemobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:20 | by ThaDafinser