User agent detail

NokiaX6-00m/CMCC (SymbianOS/9.4; Series60/5.0; Release/21.1.004; Mozilla/5.0; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/525 3gpp-gba
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaX6-00m Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 525closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4Nokiamobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0NokiaX6-00msmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser CMCCcloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4NokiaX6-00mcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia BrowsercloseSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 525NokiaOS NokiaNokia X6-00mcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.54806 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 525Series60 5.0NokiaX6-00mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:20 | by ThaDafinser