User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux zbov) Presto/2.11.355 Version/12.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Opera 12.10GNU/Linux Presto desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.10Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.10closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.10Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.10closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.10Presto 2.11.355Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 12.10Presto 2.11.355 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.05901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:18 | by ThaDafinser