User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; MD948G Build/JOP40D[20130909.172306]) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.64462
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mobile 16.0Android 4.2unknown M-wayMD-948GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android 4.2M-wayMD-948GTabletyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 4.2.1GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 16.0Blink Android 4.2yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1212closeAndroid 4.2.1MD948Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1212.64462WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 16.0Blink Android 4.2.1MD948Gtabletyescloseclose0.11101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:18 | by ThaDafinser