User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) MxNitro/1.0.0.700 Chrome/35.0.1849.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-maxthon.yaml
Maxthon Nitro 1.0.0Windows VistaBlink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Maxthon Nitro 1.0Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1849closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.08901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1849.0WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon Nitro 1.0.0Blink Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.05901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:17 | by ThaDafinser