User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1; es-es; T-Mobile MyTouch 3G Build/EPE54B) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
TmobileMyTouch 3G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.15501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.1GenericAndroid 2.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1T-MobileMyTouch 3Gsmartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.1closeAndroid 2.1TmobileMyTouch 3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 530.17Android 2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1T-MobilemyTouch 3Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.05501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:17 | by ThaDafinser