User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia309/05.80; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/1.5.0.34.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia309 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Proxy Browser 1.5Gecko SymbianOS NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 1.5Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia309smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 05.80;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 1.5.0closeNokia Series 40 Nokia309closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 1.5.0.34.16Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 309closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 1.5.0Gecko Series40 NokiaAsha 309mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 1.5closeNokia Series 40 Nokia309Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:16 | by ThaDafinser