User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; Id; lg-kf510 obigo) UCBrowser8.4.0.159/70/352/UCWEB Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGkf510 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.06501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.4 LGkf510smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.4.0close LGkf510closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGkf510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo LGkf510mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:16 | by ThaDafinser