User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Opera Mini 0.0JAVA unknown2.2 unknowngeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.10closeJVM desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.10Presto 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 2.8.119close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.10close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini Presto 2.8.119 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari closeiOS OperaMini 1Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:15 | by ThaDafinser