User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (S60V3; U; en-us; NOKIA6650d-1bH) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.6.0.199/28/444/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6650d-1bH Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.07401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.6WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 V3Nokia6650d-1bHsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 530.13closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.0closeSymbian OS Nokia6650d-1bHcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.6.0.199WebKit 530.13 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.6Gecko Series60 3Nokia6650 foldmobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:15 | by ThaDafinser