User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Otter/0.9.05
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-788.php
Otter 0.9Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Otter 0.9Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Otter 0.9.05closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Otter 0.9.5closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Otter 0.9.05Webkit 538.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:15 | by ThaDafinser