User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (;;;) AppleWebKit/534.6 HbbTV/1.1.1 (+DL+PVR; inverto; IDL 6654N Volksbox Web Edition +; 1.0; 1.0;) hdplusinteraktiv/1.0 (NETRANGEMMH;) CE-HTML/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Webkit 534.6InvertoIDL 6654N Volksbox Web Edition +television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake BrowserBot/Crawler0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
InvertoIDL 6654N Volksbox Web Edition +tv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close invertoIDL 6654N Volksbox Web Edition +closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.6 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.6 InvertoIDL 6654N Volksbox Web Edition +televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:14 | by ThaDafinser