User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; olleh tv; U; xx; SMT-E5015) AppleWebKit/536.25 (KHTML, like Gecko) AltiBrowser/3.0.4 (olleh tv; Large Screen) Safari/536.25
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Safari 3.0.4GNU/Linux WebKit 536.25SamsungSMT-E5015tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 536.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungSMT-E5015tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.024 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
iBrowser 3.0.4WebKit 536.25Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AltiBrowser 3.0.4Webkit 536.25 SamsungOlleh SkyLife Smart Settopboxtelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:13 | by ThaDafinser