User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SGHT100/1.0 UP.Browser/4.1.26b
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGHT100 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 Mobile Phoneyes0.04601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-SGHT100 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26bclose SamsungSGH-T100mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1 SamsungSGHT100smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 4.1.26close SamsungSGHT100closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 4.1.26b closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 4.1 SamsungSGHT100mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungSGH-T100Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:13 | by ThaDafinser