User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; SC-04E Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.169 Mobile Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSC-04E Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.2.2DoCoMoSC-04Emobile-browseryescloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 25.0WebKit Android 4.2SamsungGALAXY S4smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.2.2SamsungSC-04Ecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169WebKit 537.22Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.2.2SamsungGALAXY S4 SC-04Emobile:smartyescloseclose0.033 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 26closeAndroid 4.2DoCoMoSC-04ESmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.07401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:13 | by ThaDafinser