User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 2.3.5; zh-CN; GT-I9100) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.6.1.401 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
UC Browser 9.6.1.401Android 2.3.5 SamsungGALAXY S IIsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.6U2 Android 2.3SamsungGalaxy S IIMobile Phoneyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux SamsungGT-I9103mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.6 Android 2.3SamsungGALAXY S IIsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.6.1closeAndroid 2.3.5SamsungGT-I9100closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.6.1.401 Linux SamsungGalaxy S IIcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.6Gecko Android 2.3.5SamsungGalaxy S IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 2.3SamsungGT-I9100Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:12 | by ThaDafinser