User agent detail

NetSurf/2.0 (RISC OS; armv5l)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-riscos.yaml
Surf 2.0RISC OS desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesNetSurfBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NetSurf 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetSurf 2.0closeRISK OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
RISC OS yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
NetSurf 2.0closeRISC OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.11101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Surf 2.0 RISC OS desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:10 | by ThaDafinser