User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (New Nintendo 3DS like iPhone) AppleWebKit/536.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) NX/3.0.0.5.10 Mobile NintendoBrowser/1.1.9996.EU
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/nintendo.yaml
NetFront NX 3.0 Webkit 536.30NintendoNew 3DSgaming:portableyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mobile Safari UIWebView WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.17002 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NintendoBrowser 1.1.9996.EUcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront WebKit iOS Nintendo3DSconsoleyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX 3.0.0close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nintendo Browser 1.1.9996.EUNetFront 536.30 NintendoNintendo 3DScloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront NX 3.0Webkit 536.30 NintendoNew 3DSgaming:portableyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1closeiOS AppleiPhoneFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:10 | by ThaDafinser