User agent detail

SonyEricssonP910i/R1A SEMC-Browser/Symbian/3.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonP910i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SEMC Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonP910i R1Acloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SEMC Browser closeUIQ Sony EricssonP910mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SEMC-Browser Symbian^3 Sony EricssonP910ifeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeSymbian^3 SonyEricssonP910icloseclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SEMC-Browser closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson P910icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SEMC Browser UIQ Sony EricssonP910mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SonyEricssonP910iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:10 | by ThaDafinser