User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64) AppleWebKit/535.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/17.0.963.56 Safari/535.11
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Chrome 17FreeBSD Webkit 535.11desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 17.0WebKit FreeBSD Desktop0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 17.0WebKit FreeBSD desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 17.0.963closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 17.0.963.56WebKit 535.11FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 17Webkit 535.11FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:09 | by ThaDafinser