User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad3,6; iPad; U; CPU OS 7_0_4 like Mac OS X; de_DE) com.google.GooglePlus/29676 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/P103AP (gzip)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AppleiPad3,6 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Google+ App WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Google Plus iOS 7.0AppleiPad 4tabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 7.0.4closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 7.0.4closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPad3,6closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla closeiPhone OS 7.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0 iOS 7.0.4AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Google+ iOS 7.0.4AppleiPad (4th gen)tabletyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0.3closeiOS 7.0.3AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:09 | by ThaDafinser