User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.116 Safari/537.36 HubSpot Webcrawler
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-439.php
yesHubSpot WebcrawlerBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesHubSpot WebcrawlerBot/Crawler0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.116closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.116closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.116closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesWebcrawlerclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.116closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.116WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.116closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:09 | by ThaDafinser