User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032711 moonOS/2.0 (kachana) Firefox/3.0.8
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.0.8moonOS 2.0Gecko 1.9.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.0Gecko 1.9.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.07901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.0.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.0.8closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.0.8closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.0.8closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.0.8closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.15302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Warpzilla 3.0.8Gecko 2009032711Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.0.8Gecko 1.9.0moonOS 2.0desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.0.8closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:08 | by ThaDafinser