User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows 95; Anonymisiert durch AlMiSoft Browser-Anonymisierer 69351893; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
IE 11.0Win8.1 6.37.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 11.0Trident 7.0Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.11701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:11.0closeWindows 95desktop-browsercloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident Windows 95desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 95closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 11.0closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.12601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows 95desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:07 | by ThaDafinser