User agent detail

Opera/9.80 WebKit/1.6.3 () PhilipsWebKit/535.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PhilipsWebKit Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.80Presto PhilipsWebKitsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.80close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.80close PhilipsWebKitcloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.80close closecloseclosecloseclose0.16202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.80WebKit 1.6.3 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.57206 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.80Webkit 1.6.3 desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.80closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:07 | by ThaDafinser