User agent detail

de.drivelog.mobile 3.2 phone HTCOneX+ android 17 de DE normal long high 720 1280
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCOneX+ android 17 de DE normal long high 720 1280 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
de closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCOneX+ android 17 de DE normal long high 720 1280mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 17HTCOneXsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 17closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCOneX+ android 17 de DE normal long high 720 1280closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android 17HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45205 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCOneX+ android 17 de DE normal long high 720 1280mobile:featureyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:07 | by ThaDafinser