User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Unknown; Linux mips) AppleWebKit/534.16+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/534.16+ IrisBrowser/4.0.17.1 HbbTV/1.2.1 (;Digisoft.tv;Iris;4.0.17.1;;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Webkit 534.16Digisoft.tvIristelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.0WebKit GNU/Linux LoeweSL220tv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1closeLinux Digisoft.tvIriscloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 4.0.17.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.16Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.48805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.16 Digisoft.tvIristelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.07301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:06 | by ThaDafinser