User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.2; en-gb; DesireA8181 Build/FRG83G) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesireA8181 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake SafariBot/Crawler0.12901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.2GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.279 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2HTCDesire A8181smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2.2closeAndroid 2.2.2HTCDesireA8181closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.2HTC Desirecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.2HTCDesiremobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:06 | by ThaDafinser