User agent detail

Opera/9.51 (X11; FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE i386; U; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
FreeBSD 6.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.51Presto 2.0FreeBSD Desktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.51closeBSD 6.1-RELEASEdesktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.51Presto FreeBSD 6.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.51closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.51closeFreeBSD 6.1closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.51closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.51 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.51 FreeBSD 6.1desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.51closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:06 | by ThaDafinser