User agent detail

MobileSafari/9537.53 CFNetwork/672.1.13 Darwin/14.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
Safari 7.0iOS 7.1unknown Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 7.0WebKit iOS 7.1AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 9537.53closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeiOS 7.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.184 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
iOS 7.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 672.1.13closeiOS 7.1Applecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari iOS 7.1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.1closeiOS 7.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:05 | by ThaDafinser