User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.0; ru; iPhone5) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/10.1.2.571 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.1Android 4.2unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.1U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeiOS MicromaxA110Qmobile-browseryescloseclose0.278 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.1 Android 4.2AppleiPhone 5smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.1.2closeAndroid 4.2.0closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.1.2.571 iOS AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.1Gecko Android 4.2.0iPhone5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.09401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:04 | by ThaDafinser