User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; N; ; ru-RU) AppleWebKit/527+ (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/419.3) Qt/4.5.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-500.php
Qt 4.5Win32 unknownunknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Qt 4.5WebKit Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 419.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 419.3closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.238 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Windows desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WebKit Nightly 527closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 527Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qt 4.5.3Webkit 527Windows desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:04 | by ThaDafinser