User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 4.0.3; zh-cn; NOVO7_Mars; 1024*552) UCWEB1.0.1.113/147/800
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Android 4.0.3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 1.0 GNU/Linux AinolA706 ROWtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 1.0.1closeAndroid 4.0.3closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 1.0.1.113closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.144 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 1.0.1.113 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 1.0 Android 4.0.3AinovoNovo7 Marstabletyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:31:04 | by ThaDafinser